Frieda je napisao:
subcomandante marcos je napisao:
грађење држава од фукујаме и ароганција моћи од бившег америчког сенатора фулбрајта.
Zvuči interesantno. Na kojem štandu ima?
Daljac je napisao:
ИСТОРИЈА РУЖНОЋЕ Умберта Ека! Купљено! Савршено! Препоручујем!
Na kojem štandu?
чуј на којем штанду, еј!

историја ружноће има у нас а фукујама и фулбрајт код филипа вишњића, одма преко пута. историја ружноће (и љепоте) 90 марака.
што се фукујаме тиче, у књизи грађење држава износи теорију да слабе и некомпетентне владе у дражавама у развоју представљају извор озбиљних проблема. а фулбрајт у својој књизи (тојест предавањима стављеним на папир) отприлике износи ово -
In 1966, Fulbright published The Arrogance of Power, in which he attacked the justification of the Vietnam War, Congress's failure to set limits on it, and the impulses which gave rise to it. Fulbright's scathing critique undermined the elite consensus that U.S. military intervention in Indochina was necessitated by Cold War geopolitics. Some critics of U.S. foreign policy argue that U.S. policy has changed little since Fulbright wrote his book, and find his words applicable today.
In his book, Fulbright offered an analysis of American foreign policy:
Throughout our history two strands have coexisted uneasily; a dominant strand of democratic humanism and a lesser but durable strand of intolerant Puritanism. There has been a tendency through the years for reason and moderation to prevail as long as things are going tolerably well or as long as our problems seem clear and finite and manageable. But... when some event or leader of opinion has aroused the people to a state of high emotion, our puritan spirit has tended to break through, leading us to look at the world through the distorting prism of a harsh and angry moralism.
Fulbright also related his opposition to any American tendencies to intervene in the affairs of other nations:
Power tends to confuse itself with virtue and a great nation is particularly susceptible to the idea that its power is a sign of God's favor, conferring upon it a special responsibility for other nations — to make them richer and happier and wiser, to remake them, that is, in its own shining image. Power confuses itself with virtue and tends also to take itself for omnipotence. Once imbued with the idea of a mission, a great nation easily assumes that it has the means as well as the duty to do God's work.
ако те занима америчка спољна политика и геополитика уопште, будем ти посудио.
