The authors studied how product preferences changed depending on whether a person was feeling pride, contentment, or a neutral emotional state. Some participants read a short story in which they imagined doing well on an exam, which is known to elicit pride. "We found that pride enhanced desire for public display products," the authors write. "Feeling pride led people to want nice watches, shoes, and clothing for going out. However, pride did not enhance desire for home products."

In contrast, the emotion of contentment led people to want products for their homes. "When people felt contentment, they were more attracted to products such as beds, dishwashers, and clothing for lounging around the house," the authors write. They were less enthusiastic about public display products.

An hour's nap can dramatically boost and restore brain power, not only refreshing the mind, but making a person smarter, U.S. researchers found.

An hour's nap can dramatically boost and restore brain power, not only refreshing the mind, but making a person smarter, U.S. researchers found.

A ovom sljedecom informacijom sam sokiran
http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/brit ... 77818.aspx

to naravno ne znaci da uopste nema inteligentnih vjernika, naprotiv, ima ih dosta.

То је исти фашизам, као и тврдња да песимисти су паметнији него оптимисти. Што сам рекла - ово само ласка таштину глупих атеиста...



Одакле знаш кога има и кога нема доста?
То уопште нема везе са интелектом, IQ-тестови ниjе мерило интелекта, као и Аријевска лобања није мерило припадности људском роду.

IQ -тестови су културно субјективни и не значе ништа......

само реци, да ли људи мисле да неки научник jе паметни због његове активности или због IQ-тестова?

Да ли прави научники сматраjу ови тестови као неку озбиљну ствар?

The history of IQ testing is rife with discrimination. Charles Darwin asserted that intelligence evolved and distinguished man from apes. IQ tests were developed by Alfred Binet, a European psychologist, to measure intelligence at a time when blacks were thought to be animals. More than help man, these tests upheld superiority complexes among whites by resorting to abstract and biased methods of intelligence testing rather than utilizing human potential in a more practical and useful way in relation to cultural contexts. IQ tests often failed to utilize a wealth of human talent by examining only the componential aspect of intelligence and being culturally inflexible. The very nature of such limited IQ tests is to discriminate against those who do not fit its model and surely more practical and useful ways of evaluating people can be formulated.

It is being realized in more modern times that IQ tests are often not fully reliable means of intelligence testing. They pay little attention to the intelligence of adaptation and practically; skills needed in the workplace that are not stressed in schools. For this reason many people with only academic smarts fail to be successful or make valuable contributions in the working world. To quote Sternberg, "There are plenty of people going around with high IQ's who don't do a damned thing." More recent study by Flynn, shows that IQ tests do not even really measure intelligence but rather a correlate with a weak casual link to intelligence. IQ tests therefore are tests that are often culturally biased and fail to examine intelligence properly. While they fit the vain and racist purposes of Herrnstein and Murray well, they have no universal claim on intelligence.

Па да... ако вики каже....

Читала сам озбиљан чланак о томе, али не могу га пронаћи сада. Ево нешто слично:


http://destee.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-40690.html

Питање за тебе... Зашто верници и атеисти треба да буду различити? Они иду у исту школу, живе у истом друштву... Која је разлика? Мозак?

Pitas da li se mozak vjernika i ateista razlikuje. Ne znam,

pripisujes mi rijeci koje nisam izgovorila. misli sta hoces, mene preskoci ubuduce.

to sto nauka pokusava da prouci nesto, to nije fasizam

Ипак, слажила си да тестови могу да буду нетачни. Сада замисли ситуацију да послодавци су почели да мисле да су атеисти паметнији од верника. Осим тога да нису тестови објективни, ово је основа за дискриминацију на верској основи.

И ипак ниси дала научно објашњење разлике између верника и атеиста.

Kako cu ja da dajem objasnjenje kad nauka sama nije jos na tom stepenu razvoja?

Изгледа да треба да ти објасним шта jе научно истраживање.
Научно истраживање треба да има своји методи и методологије. Имаш метод (тестови), али немаш методологију (шта је систем принципа и приступа истраживања, на којима истраживач заснива своје закључке, другим речима - теоријски део) … зато и не можеш да објасниш овај проблем.

Истраживање без методологије jе само нешто слично гласању на форуму и ништа више.